<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macao (1952): &#8220;You&#8217;re up early for a loser&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmsnoir.net/film_noir/macao-1952-youre-up-early-for-a-loser.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmsnoir.net/film_noir/macao-1952-youre-up-early-for-a-loser.html</link>
	<description>filmsnoir.net: an oasis of noir in a desert of banality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony D'Ambra</title>
		<link>http://filmsnoir.net/film_noir/macao-1952-youre-up-early-for-a-loser.html/comment-page-1#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony D'Ambra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmsnoir.net/?p=2400#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dcd, Sam, and Alexander.

Dcd, the standard reference &#039;Film Noir: An Encyclopedic Reference&#039; (Silver &amp; Ward) describes Macao as a &quot; brutal and competent noir thriller&quot;. So Selby is not alone.

Even Borde and Chaumeton in their seminal A Panorama of Film Noir (1955), who were seemingly unaware of the involvement of Nicholas Ray, devote over a page in the book analysing the contribution of &quot;the old meastro&quot;, Von Sternberg.

Bret Wood at TCM calls it &quot;a deliciously tawdry melodrama&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dcd, Sam, and Alexander.</p>
<p>Dcd, the standard reference &#8216;Film Noir: An Encyclopedic Reference&#8217; (Silver &#038; Ward) describes Macao as a &#8221; brutal and competent noir thriller&#8221;. So Selby is not alone.</p>
<p>Even Borde and Chaumeton in their seminal A Panorama of Film Noir (1955), who were seemingly unaware of the involvement of Nicholas Ray, devote over a page in the book analysing the contribution of &#8220;the old meastro&#8221;, Von Sternberg.</p>
<p>Bret Wood at TCM calls it &#8220;a deliciously tawdry melodrama&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Coleman</title>
		<link>http://filmsnoir.net/film_noir/macao-1952-youre-up-early-for-a-loser.html/comment-page-1#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmsnoir.net/?p=2400#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be the first to admit this is a fundamentally lousy movie, but, somehow, I find it strangely, bizarrely watchable. Perhaps like you, I try to guess which scenes were von Sternberg&#039;s or Ray&#039;s--and I agree with you that the Russell leg scene seems very von Sternberg. It&#039;s definitely nothing to write home about--instantly forgettable. Maybe that is why I am forgetting how bad it is, haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be the first to admit this is a fundamentally lousy movie, but, somehow, I find it strangely, bizarrely watchable. Perhaps like you, I try to guess which scenes were von Sternberg&#8217;s or Ray&#8217;s&#8211;and I agree with you that the Russell leg scene seems very von Sternberg. It&#8217;s definitely nothing to write home about&#8211;instantly forgettable. Maybe that is why I am forgetting how bad it is, haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Juliano</title>
		<link>http://filmsnoir.net/film_noir/macao-1952-youre-up-early-for-a-loser.html/comment-page-1#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Juliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmsnoir.net/?p=2400#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>Leslie Halliwell dismisses this one with &quot;A few flashy decorative touches show the director&#039;s hand, otherwise this is routine, murky thick ear.&quot;

I once owned the RKO laserdisc of this, but acquired it without having seen it.  Your summary judgement, Tony, like Halliwell&#039;s is dead-on; this is tedious and forgettable, and yes, it does not belong in the noir pantheon.  I had long forgotten this film.

Indeed Dark City Dame, what you say there is quite right, methinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leslie Halliwell dismisses this one with &#8220;A few flashy decorative touches show the director&#8217;s hand, otherwise this is routine, murky thick ear.&#8221;</p>
<p>I once owned the RKO laserdisc of this, but acquired it without having seen it.  Your summary judgement, Tony, like Halliwell&#8217;s is dead-on; this is tedious and forgettable, and yes, it does not belong in the noir pantheon.  I had long forgotten this film.</p>
<p>Indeed Dark City Dame, what you say there is quite right, methinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkcitydame</title>
		<link>http://filmsnoir.net/film_noir/macao-1952-youre-up-early-for-a-loser.html/comment-page-1#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>darkcitydame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmsnoir.net/?p=2400#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Hi! Tony,
A &lt;i&gt;&quot;pretty&lt;/i&gt; honest&quot; review (Why did I just use the word &quot;pretty?&quot;) about a film that author Spencer Selby, added to his list of 500+ of &lt;i&gt;&quot;usual suspect(s)&quot;&lt;/i&gt; in his book &lt;b&gt;&quot;DarkCity:The Film Noir&quot;&lt;/b&gt; methink, that I&#039;am going to have to &quot;rethink&quot; whether this film should be added to my list of films that belong in my list of &lt;b&gt;&quot;Film Noir: Hall of Fame&quot; or &quot;Film Noir: Hall of Shame.&quot;&lt;/b&gt; 
(Film Noir: Hall of Shame Definition:It may be considered a film noir, but it&#039;s almost a &quot;shame&quot; that it&#039;s considered a film noir.)Your readership, can just imagine my definition for the &quot;Film Noir:Hall of Fame.&quot;)
Tks,
DCD ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Tony,<br />
A <i>&#8220;pretty</i> honest&#8221; review (Why did I just use the word &#8220;pretty?&#8221;) about a film that author Spencer Selby, added to his list of 500+ of <i>&#8220;usual suspect(s)&#8221;</i> in his book <b>&#8220;DarkCity:The Film Noir&#8221;</b> methink, that I&#8217;am going to have to &#8220;rethink&#8221; whether this film should be added to my list of films that belong in my list of <b>&#8220;Film Noir: Hall of Fame&#8221; or &#8220;Film Noir: Hall of Shame.&#8221;</b><br />
(Film Noir: Hall of Shame Definition:It may be considered a film noir, but it&#8217;s almost a &#8220;shame&#8221; that it&#8217;s considered a film noir.)Your readership, can just imagine my definition for the &#8220;Film Noir:Hall of Fame.&#8221;)<br />
Tks,<br />
DCD ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  filmsnoir.net/film_noir/macao-1952-youre-up-early-for-a-loser.html/feed ) in 0.34941 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 11:52 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 12:52 am UTC -->
